The Federal High Court in Abuja on Friday ordered the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission and five other security agencies to file their defence in a suit instituted by a businesswoman, Dr. Aisha Achimugu, to stop her planned arrest and detention.
Other security agencies listed in the fundamental rights enforcement suit are the Nigeria Police Force, Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission, and Department of State Service.
They also include the Nigeria Security and Civil Defence Corps and Nigeria Immigration Service.
Justice Inyang Ekwo gave the order following a complaint by Achimugu’s lawyer, Kehinde Ogunwumiju (SAN), that despite being served with the earlier order of the court, none of the respondents was in court to show cause why the applicant’s prayers should not be granted.
The News Agency of Nigeria reports that Achimugu had in an ex-parte motion, marked: FHC/ABJ/CS/626/2025, sued the NPF, ICPC, and DSS as 1st to 3rd respondents.
The applicant, through her lawyer, also joined the EFCC, NSCDC, and NIS as 4th to 6th respondents in the motion dated and filed April 3.
Achimugu sought an order of interim injunction restraining the respondents from threatening or harassing her with arrest, detention and invasion of her “properties or threatening to impede her fundamental right to freedom of movement, liberty, privacy and properties”.
- Bayelsa Governor, Deputy, welcome Renaissance leadership
- 2027 Coalition: We will use any good vehicle — Atiku + Video
- Police reject N1m bribe, apprehend two suspected car thieves
- Air Peace celebrates Gold Chinyere Ike, first woman to travel by air in her community
- Obasa calls for unity as court declares removal illegal, unconstitutional
She also sought an order of interim injunction restraining the respondents from arresting, harassing, detaining, or violating her right to life, freedom of movement, liberty, and/or all such other rights as guaranteed by Chapter 4 of the Constitution pending the hearing and determination of the originating motion.
She prayed for an interim order restraining the respondents “from giving effect to the declaration dated 28th March, 2025 wherein the applicant was declared wanted”.
The businesswoman equally sought an interim order restraining the respondents from taking any further steps in connection with the subject matter of the suit and maintaining status quo ante bellum or staying all actions pending the hearing and determination of the originating motion, among others.
While given 10 grounds why her application should be granted, Achimugu said on March 28, the EFCC declared her wanted.
She said that her declaration as “wanted” was unwarranted, unjustifiable, devoid of probable cause, and is calculated to discredit, humiliate, and subject her to public opprobrium, thereby causing irreparable harm to her reputation, personal dignity, and professional standing.
She said: “As a direct consequence of the declaration made by the 4th respondent, the applicant has suffered irreparable harm, including severe damage to her hard earned reputation, substantial disruptions to her business operations, financial losses, emotional distress, and social stigma.
“The adverse publicity and negative perception generated by the respondents’ actions have not only undermined her professional credibility but have also jeopardised existing business relationships, deterred potential investors and partners, and subjected the applicant to unwarranted public scrutiny and distress.”
According to Achimugu, the applicant is facing an immediate or imminent threat of arrest and other adverse actions by the respondents, which, if executed, will result in irreparable harm and breach her fundamental rights as guaranteed by Chapter 4 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (as amended).
The embattled industrialist said granting the application is the only means to prevent the immediate and irreparable breach of her fundamental rights.
She said the grant of the reliefs sought against the respondents would not unduly prejudice public interest nor hinder the legitimate discharge of their statutory functions.
She prayed the court to grant her application in the interest of justice.
An affidavit in support of the motion deposed to by Ifeanyi Otuya, who is said to be her brother, said Achimugu “is an internationally renowned industrialist, businesswoman, law abiding citizen and philanthropist whose exemplary leadership and commitment to empowering communities have earned her international recognition”.
Otuya said as the Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer of Felak Concept Group, she oversees a consortium specialising in civil, structural, and transportation engineering.
“She also chairs SAM Oil and Gas Limited, one of the major players in the exploration, production, and distribution of petroleum products in Nigeria,” he said.
He said due to her significant health issues, Achimugu travelled to the United Kingdom (UK) on March 3 to receive the necessary medical care.
He said EFCC on March 4 issued a letter of invitation for her to appear for “certain clarification” in respect of an ongoing investigation.
“The applicant could not honour the invitation immediately because she was already in the United Kingdom to prepare for medical treatment,” he said.
Otuya said on March 6, Achimugu informed him that upon her arrival in the UK, her doctors requested specific medical documents essential for her treatment, which were securely stored in her personal safe in Nigeria.
He said Achimugu had to return to Nigeria.
According to him: “I am aware that on 8th March, 2025, the applicant arrived in Nigeria to retrieve the aforementioned medical documents, and on March 9, she returned to the UK.”
He said since she would be unable to attend the EFCC’s scheduled invitation on March 5, she briefed her lawyer, Darlington Ozurumba, to convey her inability to honour the invitation in writing to the commission.
He said on March 5, Ozurumba wrote to the commission and on March 12, another letter was written seeking a reschedule of the invitation to either April 28 or 29.
Otuya, however, said on March 11, an EFCC official, in a WhatsApps message, told Achimugu that her claim of being abroad was false and demanded her appearance on March 13 or be declared wanted.
He said unfortunately, the anti-graft agency, on March 28, declared her wanted for alleged case of criminal conspiracy and money laundering.
He said when he drew Achimugu’s attention to the publication, her already fragile state of health deteriorated further.
When Ogunwumiju moved the motion ex-parte on April 7, Justice Ekwo did not grant the prayers.
Rather, the judge ordered that the respondents be put on notice to come and show cause why the reliefs should not be granted and adjourned until April 11.
Meanwhile, when the matter was called on Friday, no lawyer appeared for the respondents.
Ogunwumiju, who also appeared for Achimugu, informed the court that none of the respondents had filed any reply to their application.
“The court made an order that they be served within 24 hours and we complied with some of them being served the same day,” he said.
The lawyer said they were ready to proceed since they had failed to show cause.
“What you want is what is good for your client?” the judge asked, and Ogunwumiju responded in the affirmative.
Justice Ekwo said: “In that case, I will ask you to slow your speed down.
“I want the respondents to appear in court and once they submit to jurisdiction, I will make further orders.
“I will give them one more opportunity.”
The judge then asked Ogunwumiju what date Achimugu would be returning to the country and the lawyer said on April 29.
“I might have to bring you back on 28th April, 2025, being the date the court is resuming since the applicant is coming back the next day,” Justice Ekwo said.
In a ruling, the judge subsequently adjourned the matter until April 28 for the respondents to show cause.
He also directed that the hearing notice be issued and served on the respondents.
Follow The Eagle Online Channel on WhatsApp
